Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ²
![ΠΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ: Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ²](https://gugn.ru/work/3488763/cover.png)
Evans D.J. h APDiversity in the variable region of Helicobacter pylori cagA gene involves more than simple repetition of a 102-nucleotide sequence. // Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1998. T. 245. № 3. C. 780β784. Duret S., Andre A., Renaudin J. Specific gene targeting in Spiroplasma citri: improved vectors and production of unmarked mutations using site-specific… Π§ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΅ΡΡ >
Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
ΠΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅, Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ — ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π°Π³Π°Π΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΠ· Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡ Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ. ΠΡΠΊΡΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΊ? ΠΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΊ, Π° Π½Π΅ Ρ Π°ΠΎΡ ΠΈ Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ? Π Π΅ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π±Ρ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π° Ρ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ΄, Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π±Ρ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π·Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ Π΅Π΅ Π² ΡΠ°Π½ Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ."
ΠΠ΅Π² Π¨Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ· Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Π― Π΄ΡΠΌΠ°Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ½ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ·Π³Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Ρ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π·Π°Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΎ Π΅Π΄Π΅, ΡΠ½Π΅, Π΄ΡΡΠ·ΡΡΡ , Π»ΡΠ±Π²ΠΈ, ΠΎΠ±ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ."
ΠΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° Π’Π΅ΡΠ»Π°
Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ° Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² (ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ, ΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ, Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ)
ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ.
1) ΠΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ. ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Ρ.
2) Π‘ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠ² Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ² Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Acholeplasma laidlawii, Spiroplasma melliferum ΠΈ.
Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis.
3) ΠΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ², Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.
4) ΠΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΡ Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΠΉ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ.
4.5 ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅.
Π Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΌ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Ρ, Π²ΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΡΡ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π² ΡΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΡΠ°Π΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΡ ΡΠΎ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π»Π°Π²ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ², ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ» ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°ΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Ρ ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΡ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ. ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ» ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ΄. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, Π² ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΎ Π½Π°Π³Π»ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΠ° ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΉΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π±Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Ρ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Ρ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅.
1.. Peters, W., Heitmann, S. and D’Haese J. Formation and fine structure of peritrophic membranes in the earwig, Forficula auricularia. // Entomol. Gen. 1979. T. 3. C. 241−254.
2. Altschul S.F. h flp. Basic local alignment search tool. // Journal of molecular biology. 1990. T. 215. № 3. C. 403−10.
3. Ammar E.-D. h «p. An attachment tip and pili-like structures in insectand plant-pathogenic spiroplasmas of the class Mollicutes. // Archives of microbiology. 2004. T. 181. № 2. C. 97 105.
4. Arslan D. hp. Distant Mimivirus relative with a larger genome highlights the fundamental features of Megaviridae // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011. T. 108. № 42. C. 17 486−91.
5. Awa S.H.I.G.E.Y.U.K.I.K.A.K.I.Z. Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects // Molecular Plant Pathology. 2008. T. 9. C. 403−423.
6. Baba T. h /ip. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. // Molecular systems biology. 2006. T. 2. C. 2006.0008.
7. Badger J.H., Olsen G.J. CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. // Molecular biology and evolution. 1999. T. 16. № 4. C. 512−24.
8. Boutareaud A. n jp. Disruption of a Gene Predicted To Encode a Solute Binding Protein of an ABC Transporter Reduces Transmission of Spiroplasma citri by the Leafhopper Circulifer haematoceps // Society. 2004. T. 70. № 7. C. 3960−3967.
9. Brosch M. h ap. Comparison of Mascot and XITandem performance for low and high accuracy mass spectrometry and the development of an adjusted Mascot threshold. // Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2008. T. 7. № 5. C. 962−70.
10. Callister S.J. h /ip. Comparative Bacterial Proteomics: Analysis of the Core Genome Concept // Comparative and General Pharmacology. 2008. № 2.
11. Carle P. h «p. Partial Chromosome Sequence of Spiroplasma citri Reveals Extensive Viral Invasion and Important Gene Decay Partial Chromosome Sequence of Spiroplasma citri Reveals Extensive Viral Invasion and Important Gene Decay f H 2010.
12. Cavalier-Smith T. Nucleomorphs: enslaved algal nuclei. // Current opinion in microbiology. 2002. T. 5. № 6. C. 612−9.
13. Charpentier M., Percheron F. The chitin-degrading enzyme system of a Streptomyces species. // The International journal of biochemistry. 1983. T. 15. № 3. C. 289−92.
14. Chevalier C., Saillard C., Bove J.M. Spiralins of Spiroplasma citri and Spiroplasma melliferum: amino acid sequences and putative organization in the cell membrane. // J. Bacteriol. 1990. T. 172. № 10. C. 6090−6097.
15. Chou H.-H., Holmes M.H. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal // Bioinformatics. 2001. T. 17. № 12. C. 1093−1104.
16. Colinge J., Masselot A. Mass spectrometry has married statistics: uncle is functionality, children are selectivity and sensitivity // 2004. T. 3. № 2.
17. Duret S., Andre A., Renaudin J. Specific gene targeting in Spiroplasma citri: improved vectors and production of unmarked mutations using site-specific recombination. // Microbiology (Reading, England). 2005. T. 151. β Pt 8. C. 2793−803.
18. Duret S. h Gene disruption through homologous recombination in Spiroplasma citri: an scml-disrupted motility mutant is pathogenic. // Journal of bacteriology. 1999. T. 181. № 24. C. 7449−56.
19. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. //Nature methods. 2007. T. 4. № 3. C. 207−14.
20. Ewing B. h zip. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. // Genome research. 1998. T. 8. № 3. C. 175−85.
21. Fang G., Rocha E., Danchin A. How essential are nonessential genes? // Molecular biology and evolution. 2005. T. 22. № 11. C. 2147−56.
22. Fischer W. h «p. Strain-specific genes of Helicobacter pylori: genome evolution driven by a novel type IV secretion system and genomic island transfer. // Nucleic acids research. 2010. T. 38. № 18. C. 6089−6101.
23. Fletcher J. n The phytopathogenic mollicute-insect vector interface: a closer look. // Phytopathology. 1998. T. 88. № 12. C. 1351−8.
24. Fraser C.M.M. n jsp. The minimal gene complement of Mycoplasma genitalium. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 1995. T. 270. № 5235. C. 397−403.
25. Gasparich G.E. Spiroplasmas and phytoplasmas: microbes associated with plant hosts. // Biologicals: journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization. 2010. T. 38. № 2. C. 193−203.
26. Gupta N. h «p. Comparative proteogenomics: combining mass spectrometry and comparative genomics to analyze multiple genomes. // Genome research. 2008. T. 18. № 7. C. 1133−42.
27. Jungblut P.R. h jsp. Helicobacter pylori proteomics by 2-DE / MS, 1-DE-LC / MS and functional data mining // Heart. 2010. C. 182−193.
28. Kapp E.A. h ap. An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis. // Proteomics. 2005. T. 5. № 13. C. 3475−90.
29. Killiny N. h ffp. Identification of a Spiroplasma citri hydrophilic protein associated with insect transmissibility. // Microbiology (Reading, England). 2006. T. 152. β Pt 4. C. 1221−30.
30. Kobayashi K. h Ap. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003. T. 100. № 8. C. 4678−83.
31. Krogh A. h APPredicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. // Journal of molecular biology. 2001. T. 305. № 3. C. 56 780.
32. Kwon M.O., Wayadande a C., Fletcher J. Spiroplasma citri Movement into the Intestines and Salivary Glands of Its Leafhopper Vector, Circulifer tenellus. // Phytopathology. 1999. T. 89. № 12. C. 1144−51.
33. Lartigue C. h «p. Creating bacterial strains from genomes that have been cloned and engineered in yeast. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 2009. T. 325. № 5948. C. 1693−6.
34. Llopis P.M. h flp. Spatial organization of the flow of genetic information in bacteria // Nature. 2010. T. 466. № 7302. C. 77−81.
35. Lowe T.M., Eddy S.R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. //Nucleic acids research. 1997. T. 25. № 5. C. 955−64.
36. Marais a, Bove J.M., Renaudin J. Characterization of the recA gene regions of Spiroplasma citri and Spiroplasma melliferum. // Journal of bacteriology. 1996. T. 178. № 23. C. 7003−9.
37. McGuffin L.J., Bryson K., Jones D.T. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. // Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2000. T. 16. № 4. C. 404−5.
38. Michalski A., Cox J., Mann M. More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. // Journal of proteome research. 2011. T. 10. № 4. C. 1785−93.
39. Moskalyk L.A., Oo M.M., Jacobs-Lorena M. Peritrophic matrix proteins of Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. // Insect molecular biology. 1996. T. 5. № 4. C. 261−8.
40. Myers G.S.A. h pp. Skewed genomic variability in strains of the toxigenic bacterial pathogen, Clostridium perfringens. // Genome research. 2006. T. 16. № 8. C. 1031−40.
41. Nakabachi A. h pp. The 160-kilobase genome of the bacterial endosymbiont Carsonella. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 2006. T. 314. № 5797. C. 267.
42. Nakai K., Horton P. PSORT: a program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. // Trends in biochemical sciences. 1999. T. 24. № 1. C. 34−6.
43. Nesvizhskii A.I. Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry and sequence database searching. // Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). 2007. T. 367. C. 87−119.
44. Nocard, Roux. The microbe of pleuropneumonia. 1896. // Reviews of infectious diseases. 2011. T. 12. № 2. C. 354−8.
45. Ozbek E. h pp. Infection and replication sites of Spiroplasma kunkelii (Class: Mollicutes) in midgut and Malpighian tubules of the leafhopper Dalbulus maidis. // Journal of invertebrate pathology. 2003. T. 82. № 3. C. 167−75.
46. Peterson S.N.S.N., Fraser C.M.C.M. The complexity of simplicity // Genome Biology. 2001. T. 2. № 2. C. 113.
47. Pop M., Kosack D.S., Salzberg S.L. Hierarchical scaffolding with Bambus. // Genome research. 2004. T. 14. № 1. C. 149−59.
48. Razin S., Yogev D., Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas // Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1998. T. 62. № 4. C. 1094−156.
49. Rutherford K. h pp. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. // Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2000. T. 16. № 10. C. 944−5.
50. Sassetti C.M., Boyd D.H., Rubin E.J. Genes required for mycobacterial growth defined by high density mutagenesis. // Molecular microbiology. 2003. T. 48. № 1. C. 77−84.
51. Schrempf H. Recognition and degradation of chitin by streptomycetes. // Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2001. T. 79. № 3−4. C. 285−9.
52. Shigenobu S. hp. Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS. //Nature. 2000. T. 407. № 6800. C. 81−6.
53. Sutton G.G. h flp. TIGR Assembler: A New Tool for Assembling Large Shotgun Sequencing Projects // 1995. T. 1. № 1.
54. Tusnady G.E., Simon I. The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. // Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2001. T. 17. № 9. C. 849−50.
55. Wang P., Granados R.R. Molecular structure of the peritrophic membrane (PM): identification of potential PM target sites for insect control. // Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology. 2001. T. 47. № 2. C. 110−8.
56. Ye F., Melcher U., Fletcher J. Molecular characterization of a gene encoding a membrane protein of Spiroplasma citri. // Gene. 1997. T. 189. № 1. C. 95−100.
57. Ye F. h ap. Extensive chromosome aberrations in Spiroplasma citri Strain BR3. // Biochemical genetics. 1996. T. 34. № 7−8. C. 269−86.
58. Yu J., Wayadande A.C., Fletcher J. Spiroplasma citri Surface Protein P89 Implicated in Adhesion to Cells of the Vector Circulifer tenellus. // Phytopathology. 2000. T. 90. № 7. C. 716−22.
59. Zhang R., Lin Y. DEG 5.0, a database of essential genes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. //Nucleic acids research. 2009. T. 37. β Database issue. C. D455−8.63. http://codonw.sourceforge.net.
60. Unipro UGENE: an open-source bioinformatics toolkithttp://ugene.unipro.ru.65. (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html).
61. Glass J.I. h flp. Essential genes of a minimal bacterium // Proc. Natl Acad. Sei. USA. 2006. T. 103. C. 425−430.
62. Koonin E.V., Wolf Y.I. Genomics of bacteria and archaea: the emerging dynamic view of the prokaryotic world. // Nucleic acids research. 2008. T. 36. № 21. C. 6688−719.
63. Hutchison III C. a. Global Transposon Mutagenesis and a Minimal Mycoplasma Genome // Science. 1999. T. 286. № 5447. C. 2165−2169.
64. Jain R., Rivera M.C., Lake J. a. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999. T. 96. № 7. C. 3801−6.
65. Pereyre S. h xp. Life on arginine for Mycoplasma hominis: clues from its minimal genome and comparison with other human urogenital mycoplasmas. // PLoS genetics. 2009. T. 5. № 10. C. el 677.
66. Commichau F.M. h ap. Novel activities of glycolytic enzymes in Bacillus subtihs: interactions with essential proteins involved in mRNA processing. // Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2009. T. 8. № 6. C. 1350−60.
67. Kuhner S. h pp. Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 2009a. T. 326. № 5957. C. 1235−40.
68. Harris J.K. h ap. The Genetic Core of the Universal Ancestor // Genome Research. 2003. β February. C. 407−412.
69. Jaffe J.D. h, o-p. The complete genome and proteome of Mycoplasma mobile. // Genome research. 2004. T. 14. № 8. C. 1447−61.
70. Gitai Z. The new bacterial cell biology: moving parts and subcellular architecture. // Cell. 2005. T. 120. № 5. C. 577−86.
71. Rasmussen S., Nielsen H.B., Jarmer H. The transcriptionally active regions in the genome of Bacillus subtilis. // Molecular microbiology. 2009. T. 73. № 6. C. 1043−57.
72. Guell M. h APTranscriptome complexity in a genome-reduced bacterium. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 2009a. T. 326. № 5957. C. 1268−71.
73. Mushegian A.R., Koonin E.V. A minimal gene set for cellular life derived by comparison of complete bacterial genomes // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996. T. 93. C. 10 268−10 273.
74. Sharma C.M. h flp. The primary transcriptome of the major human pathogen Helicobacter pylori. //Nature. 2010. T. 464. № 7286. C. 250−5.
75. Allen J.E., Pertea M., Salzberg S.L. Computational gene prediction using multiple sources of evidence. // Genome research. 2004. T. 14. № 1. C. 142−8.
76. Aim R.A., Trust T.J. Analysis of the genetic diversity of Helicobacter pylori: the tale of two genomes. // Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany). 1999. T. 77. № 12. C. 834−46.
77. Ansong C. h APProteogenomics: needs and roles to be filled by proteomics in genome annotation // Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics. 2008. T. 7. № 1. C. 50−62.
78. Armengaud J. A perfect genome annotation is within reach with the proteomics and genomics alliance. // Current opinion in microbiology. 2009. T. 12. № 3. C. 292−300.
79. Bakke P. h APEvaluation of three automated genome annotations for Halorhabdus utahensis. // PloS one. 2009. T. 4. № 7. C. e6291.
80. Chen W. h APImproving de novo sequencing of peptides using a charged tag and C-terminal digestion. // Analytical chemistry. 2007. T. 79. № 4. C. 1583−90.
81. Delcher A.L. h APImproved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. // Nucleic acids research. 1999. T. 27. № 23. C. 4636−41.
82. Delcher A.L. h APFast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. // Nucleic acids research. 2002. T. 30. № 11. C. 2478−83.
83. Domselaar G.H. Van h APBASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. //Nucleic acids research. 2005. T. 33. β Web Server issue. C. W455−9.
84. Evans D.J. h APDiversity in the variable region of Helicobacter pylori cagA gene involves more than simple repetition of a 102-nucleotide sequence. // Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1998. T. 245. № 3. C. 780−784.
85. Fisunov G.Y. h APCore proteome of the minimal cell: comparative proteomics of three mollicute species. // PloS one. 2011. T. 6. № 7. C. e21964.
86. Gallien S. h APOrtho-proteogenomics: multiple proteomes investigation through orthology and a new MS-based protocol. // Genome research. 2009. T. 19. № 1. C. 128−35.
87. Guigo R. h up. EGASP: the human ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project. // Genome biology. 2006. T. 7 Suppl 1. C. S2.1−31.
88. Guell M. h Ap. Transcriptome complexity in a genome-reduced bacterium. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 2009b. T. 326. № 5957. C. 1268−71.
89. Hafit D.H. h APTIGRFAMs: a protein family resource for the functional identification of proteins. // Nucleic acids research. 2001. T. 29. № 1. C. 41−3.
90. Hulo N. h «p. Recent improvements to the PROSITE database. // Nucleic acids research. 2004. T. 32. β Database issue. C. D134−7.
91. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics // 2007.
92. Kuipers E.J. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Quasispecies development of Helicobacter pylori observed in paired isolates obtained years apart from the same host. // The Journal of infectious diseases. 2000. T. 181. β l.C. 273−82.
93. Kurzweil R. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology.: Viking, 2005.
94. Langmead Π. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. // Genome biology. 2009. T. 10. № 3. C. R25.
95. Li H. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. // Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2009. T. 25. № 16. C. 2078;9.
96. Marais Π. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Metabolism and genetics of Helicobacter pylori: the genome era. // Microbiology and molecular biology reviews: MMBR. 1999. T. 63. № 3. C. 642−74.
97. McDonald L., Beynon R.J. Positional proteomics: preparation of amino-terminal peptides as a strategy for proteome simplification and characterization. // Nature protocols. 2006. Π’. 1. № 4. C. 1790−8.
98. Meyer F. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. GenDB~an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. //Nucleic acids research. 2003. T. 31. № 8. C. 2187−95.
99. Momynaliev K.T. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Functional Divergence of Helicobacter pylori Related to Early Gastric Cancer research articles // Strain. 2010. C. 254−267.
100. Nielsen H. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. // Protein engineering. 1997. T. 10. β l.C. 1−6.
101. Peterson J.D. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. The Comprehensive Microbial Resource. // Nucleic acids research.2001. T. 29. β l.C. 123−5.
102. Picotti P., Aebersold R., Domon B. The implications of proteolytic background for shotgun proteomics. // Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP. 2007. T. 6. № 9. C. 1589−98.
103. Punta M. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. The Pfam protein families database. // Nucleic acids research. 2011. T. 40. β Dl. C. D290-D301.
104. Sanders W.S. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. The proteogenomic mapping tool. // BMC bioinformatics. 2011. T. 12. β l.C. 115.
105. Tatusov R.L., Koonin E.V., Lipman D.J. A genomic perspective on protein families. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 1997. T. 278. № 5338. C. 631−7.
106. Tully J.G. ΠΈ Π΄Ρ. Pathogenic mycoplasmas: cultivation and vertebrate pathogenicity of a new spiroplasma. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 1977. T. 195. № 4281. C. 892−4.
107. Valentin-Hansen P., Eriksen M., Udesen C. The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq: a key player in RNA transactions. // Molecular microbiology. 2004. T. 51. № 6. C. 1525−33.
108. Wang G., Humayun M.Z., Taylor D.E. Mutation as an origin of genetic variability in Helicobacter pylori. // Trends in microbiology. 1999. T. 7. № 12. C. 488−93.
109. Spiroplasma citri genome ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡ. URL: http://iant.toulouse.inra.fr/S.citri.
110. Forster A.C., Church G.M. Towards synthesis of a minimal cell. // Molecular systems biology. 2006. T. 2. C. 45.
111. Eisen J. a. A phylogenomic study of the MutS family of proteins. // Nucleic acids research. 1998. T. 26. № 18. C. 4291−300.
112. Koonin E.V., Mushegian A.R., Bork P. Non-orthologous gene displacement. // Trends in genetics: TIG. 1996. T. 12. № 9. C. 334−6.
113. Gevaert K. h ap. Exploring proteomes and analyzing protein processing by mass spectrometric identification of sorted N-terminal peptides. // Nature biotechnology. 2003. T. 21. № 5. C. 566−9.
114. Kuhner S. h flp. Proteome organization in a genome-reduced bacterium. // Science (New York, N.Y.). 2009b. T. 326. № 5957. C. 1235−40.
115. Yamazaki S. h np. Proteome Analysis of an Aerobic Hyperthermophilic Crenarchaeon, Aeropyrum pernix K1 *? // Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2006. C. 811−823.